Re: configuration: writable MIB modules versus NETCONF/YANG modules

> On Feb 18, 2014, at 2:15 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:06:52PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Note that none of the people asking for more text have provided any
>> proposed changes.
>> 
>>   WGs should use the monitoring protocol(s) that best fit their
>> requirements.
>> 
>> How's that?
> 
> I do not see the value of such a statement since I assume this to be
> the default for any protocol selection.

	What we need is a statement as Benoit proposed because there is a *defacto* and implicit statement that WGs should use SNMP for management - just look at most charters. 

	--Tom


> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-AREA mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
>