Re: configuration: writable MIB modules versus NETCONF/YANG modules

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Hardaker" <[email protected]>
To: "Dave Thaler" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:09 AM

> Dave Thaler <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > It's worse than that.  The situation today is where the *same* WG
had to choose
> > among 4 different tools.
>
> Nope, I understand that.  Because there is no comparison table to help
> them pick!

Just like Security, where you and I have been involved in adding
security to an existing IETF protocol and it has been do we use IPsec,
Kerberos, SSL, SSH, .... with no help or guidance from a security
directorate, just an army of WGs each busy working away on its own
thing:-(

The IETF can produced over-arching strategic considerations (or the IAB
can) or the nitty gritty, but in between, we leave a hole.

Tom Petch

> --
> Wes Hardaker
> Parsons
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-AREA mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
>