Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: [802.1 - 4828] 802.1ap has been approved...

Yes, I wanted first to get feedback on this lists before approaching the
IEEE. Does anybody think that this is not a good idea or that it's a
waste of time?
 
Thanks for volunteering to do it (when we decide). 
 
Dan
 


________________________________

	From: Bert Wijnen (IETF) [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 7:03 PM
	To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); MIB Doctors (E-mail); ops-area (IETF)
	Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: [802.1 - 4828] 802.1ap has been
approved...
	
	
	Makes sense to me. We probably need to write a one or two page
(plus x boilerplate) RFC 
	for that, or so I suspect? I can do an I-D if you want. Maybe we
should make sure we keep
	802.1 in the loop on that, no?
	 
	Bert

		----- Original Message ----- 
		From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <mailto:[email protected]>  
		To: MIB Doctors (E-mail) <mailto:[email protected]>
; ops-area (IETF) <mailto:[email protected]>  
		Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:57 PM
		Subject: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: [802.1 - 4828] 802.1ap has
been approved...

		This new IEEE 802.1 standard includes the MIB modules
that replace the
		Bridge MIB. 
		
		The question is whether we should consider making RFC
4188 and RFC 4363
		Historic. 
		
		Dan
		
		
		-----Original Message-----
		From: IEEE 802.1 list HELP only
[mailto:[email protected]] On
		Behalf Of Tony Jeffree
		Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:21 PM
		
		....
		
		I have just heard that 802.1ap was approved as a
standard.
		Congratulations and thanks to all that contributed to
the success of
		this project!
		
		Regards,
		Tony
		_______________________________________________
		MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
		[email protected]
		https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors

_______________________________________________
OPS-AREA mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area