Re: Issue 2: replacement text for secure management protocolboilerplate

"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <004401c986f4$238daf40$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Hi -

> From: "David Harrington" <[email protected]>
> To: "'ops-area (IETF)'" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 7:47 AM
> Subject: [OPS-AREA] Issue 2: replacement text for secure management protocolboilerplate
...
> NEW:
> Any protocol used to manage a device should support authentication,
> encryption, integrity checking, and control of access to the
> management information. It is RECOMMENDED that operators deploy an
> IETF standard protocol for secure management, such as Netconf over SSH
> [RFC4742] or SNMPv3 [RFC3410] or syslog over TLS [RFC5425].  Operators
> SHOULD enable cryptographic security and ensure that the server/agent
> giving access to management information is properly configured to give
> access only to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to
> read/create/change/delete the information. 
...

I think the last sentence isn't quite right for syslog and SNMP notification
originators.  It's true that that's how we handle the "giving access" part in
VACM, but at the level of the cryptographic security happening during
the actual transfer of the information (rather than the configuration of how
the information is to be transferred) it's a different matter.

Randy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.