Re: ISP Shared Addresses

Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Brian,

> I think the arguments
> given in the ops-area session against the "Net 11" solution
> are pretty strong.

I agree. I was particularly interested to hear about home equipment 
generally defaulting to 192.168/16 space, which may open an ability to 
use 10/8 space on the ISP side. Of course there is no 100% guarantee 
that this will not cause problems. However, a new private address space 
would also cause problems, such as failures for mechanisms that rely on 
recognizing RFC 1918 address space as private address space.

Jari
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.