Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-03.txt]

At the meeting in San Francisco it was proposed to run this document as
an AD-sponsored individual submission. Opinions about this track
including other proposals about what to do further with this document
are also welcome. 

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:41 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: RJ Atkinson; Flinck,Hannu
> Subject: [OPS-AREA] [Fwd: I-D 
> Action:draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-03.txt]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This update reflects the comments we received at IETF74 and 
> since then. We'd be interested in further comments, of course.
> 
>     Brian
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-03.txt
> Date: Wed,  6 May 2009 21:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
> From: [email protected]
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
> Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
> 	Title           : Renumbering still needs work
> 	Author(s)       : B. Carpenter, et al.
> 	Filename        : draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-03.txt
> 	Pages           : 33
> 	Date            : 2009-05-06
> 
> This document reviews the existing mechanisms for site 
> renumbering for both IPv4 and IPv6, and identifies 
> operational issues with those mechanisms.  It also summarises 
> current technical proposals for additional mechanisms.  
> Finally there is a gap analysis identifying possible areas 
> for future work.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-renum-need
s-work-03.txt

_______________________________________________
OPS-AREA mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area