Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401A46408@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
There are a number of issues that gathered around 4181 that would
deserve attention if a willing editor is found. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of C. M. Heard
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 12:48 AM
> To: MIB Doctors (E-mail)
> Cc: OPS Area (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: IESG Statement on Copyright
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> It seems to me that the new IESG statement on MIB and PIB 
> module copyrights obsoletes Section 3.7 of RFC 4181 
> (Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of MIB Documents) and 
> all of RFC 4841 (RFC 4181 Update to Recognize the IETF 
> Trust).  If the cycles exist to do it, someone should write a 
> short RFC to update RFC 4181 and to obsolete RFC 4841, or 
> even better, issue an upated version of the mib guidelines 
> that obsoletes both 4181 and 4841.
> 
> Just in case anyone should ask, I'm stil retired from MIB 
> work, and I don't have the cycles to do it myself.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Mike Heard
> 
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf 
> > Of IESG Secretary
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 10:45 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: IESG Statement on Copyright
> > 
> > This IESG Statement obsoletes all earlier IESG Statements regarding 
> > Copyright statements in MIB and PIB Modules.
> > 
> > The IESG is providing this guidance to align current 
> practice with RFC 
> > 5377, RFC 5378, and the resulting IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP) 
> > (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
> > 
> > IETF Contributions and IETF Documents often include code components 
> > that are intended to be directly processed by a computer. 
> Examples of 
> > such code components include ABNF definitions, XML Schemas, 
> XML DTDs, 
> > XML RelaxNG definitions, tables of values, MIBs, PIBs, ASN.1, and 
> > classical programming source code. The IETF Trust maintains 
> a list of 
> > code component types. A link to this list can be found on this web
> > page: http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info.
> > 
> > In addition to the code component types listed, any text 
> found between 
> > the markers &lt;CODE BEGINS&gt; and &lt;CODE ENDS&gt; shall be 
> > considered a code component. Authors may wish to use these 
> markers as 
> > clear delimiters of code components.
> > 
> > Authors are encouraged to collect code into a separate section or 
> > appendix.
> > 
> > The TLP requires copyright notice in IETF Documents, but not 
> > necessarily in each code component within an IETF Document. Authors 
> > may choose to include a copyright notice as a comment when a 
> > significant amount of code is collected together. For 
> example, authors 
> > may include a copyright notice in a comment as part of an 
> ASN.1 module 
> > or a representation of a classical programming language 
> file. If IETF 
> > Document authors choose to include a code component 
> copyright notice 
> > comment, they must follow the guidance in Section 6.d of the TLP.
> > Implementors that extract any code component from the IETF Document 
> > must include the BSD license text as described in Section 
> 4.e of the TLP.
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.