Re: Fw: IETF Outcomes wiki

The real bad thing is that you now get news-articles like
     http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/020410-ietf-turns-introspective-with-new.html

And so if the people who do not understand that this is really not reflecting the current
state at all..... they may get the complete wrong picture!!!!!!

Bert
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dave CROCKER 
  To: Bert Wijnen (IETF) 
  Cc: ops-area (IETF) 
  Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 5:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [OPS-AREA] Fw: IETF Outcomes wiki




  On 2/7/2010 3:26 AM, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
  > Wow... sofar that does not look so good for the OPS area.
  > Only a couple of protocols that we did in the late 80s (so even before I
  > participated... or maybe just because of that :-() seem to have good
  > adoption.


  For the initial version of the wiki, we did not try to be complete and we were 
  not all that systematic.  It was a case of what examples some of us thought of. 
  The most interesting choices were ones tested the limits of the wiki's template 
  format, so we could consider enhancements to the form of the wiki.

  As Dan's notes suggests, the nice thing about a wiki is that any of you (with an 
  IETF tools login) can add to it or fix errors.

  Please do!

  d/
  -- 

     Dave Crocker
     Brandenburg InternetWorking
     bbiw.net



------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  Geen virus gevonden in het binnenkomende-bericht.
  Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com 
  Versie: 9.0.733 / Virusdatabase: 271.1.1/2673 - datum van uitgifte: 02/07/10 08:22:00

_______________________________________________
OPS-AREA mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area