Re: again about ietf-outcomes
Wes Hardaker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sparta |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:49:26 +0100, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]> said: DR> David Harrington put some work in improving the content of the wiki page DR> at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/misc/outcomes/wiki/IetfOperations in what DR> concerns SNMP and SMI. It would be good if other folks have a look and DR> especially if they can spare some time adding more exact and detailed DR> information related to the other management protocols. Being the project leader of a major SNMP stack, I find it odd that we've marked SNMPv3 as "poor adoption". It's definitely deployed and adopted from the perspective of what my users ask questions about. It's definitely confusing to many (or they wouldn't ask questions) and it's definitely not as big of a percentage as we'd like (hence the need for ISMS), but to say that it's "poor adoption" is a bit odd. "Some" would be a better marking, IMHO. Definitely not "massive". Unfortunately, we don't have an "ehhh" marking. -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions