Re: [v6ops] [OPSAWG] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs

Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops,gmane.ietf.v6ops
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Greetings James,

On 11Nov2010, at 19.10, james woodyatt wrote:

> On Nov 10, 2010, at 22:29, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>> On 11/11/10 2:11 PM, "james woodyatt" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Nov 10, 2010, at 21:45, STARK, BARBARA H (ATTLABS) wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> IMO, not providing this IPv4 address block will actually slow down IPv6
>>>> deployments, because more resources will be required to make sure the
>>>> introduction of NAT444 is done "right".
>>> 
>>> How will directing IANA to allocate the NAT444 block speed up IPv6 deployment?
>> 
>> We have found problems in deploying NAT444 with RFC1918.  The same resources
>> (as with many operators) can work on fixing those problems (as stated
>> previously) or work on IPv6. (I would like to work on IPv6).
> 
> That doesn't answer the question.  For clarity, I asked the same question twice, worded a little differently the second time.  Here it is again...
> 
>>> What advantage is there in directing *IANA* to do it?
> 
> I understand why you want to use a prefix not listed in RFC 1918.  I don't understand why getting it from IANA will be any better for you than if you get it from Joe's House Of IPv4 Addresses.

It's simple, operators out of at least 2 of the 5 RIR regions are saying they need this.  I would bet that operators in all RIR regions would use this if available (heads pulled in after the bruising battle this has been in the past).  As it is "global" it does not seem fair to ask one RIR to sacrifice for the rest.  If you are not talking RIR, then transfer policies make that pretty much a one-way street for the donor.

> 
> 
> --
> james woodyatt <[email protected]>
> member of technical staff, communications engineering
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-AREA mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
> 

---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc

_______________________________________________
OPS-AREA mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
PGP.sig (application/pgp-signature, 455 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.