Re: Heads Up - Need to clarify the issue
Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/11/10 5:12 PM, Rémi Després wrote: > > > Le 9 nov. 2010 à 10:29, Fred Baker a écrit : > >> Chris Liljenstolpe has a proposal that he made in ops-area today, >> for a mechanism to create what amounts to an RFC 1918 prefix, but >> specifically for use in NAT444 ISP configurations. > > Some comments object the idea because it is understood as one more > RFC1918 prefix. Could you confirm (or invalidate) this > understanding: > > "The request if for ONE /8 (not more, not less) to be NEITHER in RFC > 1918 NOR in the global address space." > > If it is different, could you explain what it is? I believe my characterization of the prefix as a special use ipv4 address prefix (as are rfc 1918 address blocks) is accurate. The use is rfc-1918-like but the folks who believe that they need it would like to tell you not to use it for that purpose. > Thanks, RD > > > > >> It involves a request to the ARIN board. He will write a quick >> draft and post it this week, discuss this Thursday in the Ops WG, >> and call the question in Friday's v6ops meeting. Due to the real >> time nature of the discussion, I'll ask folks to be aware and >> follow it. _______________________________________________ v6ops >> mailing list [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list > [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops