Re: [OPSAWG] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs

Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ops,gmane.ietf.v6ops
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank's for the clarity, Brian.

	Chris

On 11Nov2010, at 19.51, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> On 2010-11-11 21:27, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>> On 11/11/10 4:10 PM, "james woodyatt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> ...
>>> That doesn't answer the question.  For clarity, I asked the same question
>>> twice, worded a little differently the second time.  Here it is again...
>>> 
>>>>> What advantage is there in directing *IANA* to do it?
>>> I understand why you want to use a prefix not listed in RFC 1918.  I don't
>>> understand why getting it from IANA will be any better for you than if you get
>>> it from Joe's House Of IPv4 Addresses.
>>> 
>> The goal here was that in aggregate, the provides use less global space for
>> a common use. It is more efficient for providers to share a block, then all
>> go to the RIRs and ask for their own slice.
> 
> That isn't quite the question, I think. So let me answer the actual
> question: What advantage is there in directing *IANA* to do it?
> 
> The answer is in RFC 2650 "Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the
> Technical Work of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority".
> 
> Under this agreement, the IETF *can* direct IANA to allocate
> IP address space for technical purposes. See the subclause (b)
> in clause 4.3. There is no other route by which the IETF can
> direct IANA to allocate address space, and the IETF certainly
> can't direct the RIRs in any way whatever.
> 
> So to answer James, the advantage is that the IETF *can*
> direct IANA, but the IETF can't direct the RIRs.
> 
> I don't believe the IETF *should* do this, but as the initial
> drafter and a signatory of the MoU published as RFC 2650,
> I thought I should clarify what's really going on here. Getting
> this proposal through IETF consensus and IESG approval would
> result in a direct order to IANA.
> 
>    Brian
> 
> .
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 

---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc

_______________________________________________
OPS-AREA mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
PGP.sig (application/pgp-signature, 455 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.