Re: [OPS-AREA] Heads Up - Need to clarify the issue

On 11Nov2010, at 20.12, Rémi Després wrote:

> 
> 
> Le 9 nov. 2010 à 10:29, Fred Baker a écrit :
> 
>> Chris Liljenstolpe has a proposal that he made in ops-area today, for a mechanism to create what amounts to an RFC 1918 prefix, but specifically for use in NAT444 ISP configurations.
> 
> Some comments object the idea because it is understood as one more RFC1918 prefix.
> Could you confirm (or invalidate) this understanding:
> 
> "The request if for ONE /8 (not more, not less) to be NEITHER in RFC 1918 NOR in the global address space."

You are correct, Rémi.

> 
> If it is different, could you explain what it is?
> 
> Thanks,
> RD
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> It involves a request to the ARIN board. He will write a quick draft and post it this week, discuss this Thursday in the Ops WG, and call the question in Friday's v6ops meeting. Due to the real time nature of the discussion, I'll ask folks to be aware and follow it.
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-AREA mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-area
> 

---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops