Re: [OPS-AREA] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs

On 11Nov2010, at 21.32, Tore Anderson wrote:

> * Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
> 
>> We all are here to keep this engine going.
> 
> That's futile.  It'll run dry and stop, either tomorrow or the day after
> tomorrow.  Those that have not already prepared will get in trouble,
> regardless of how you go about obtaining your /10.

By engine, I meant the Internet, not v4 the way we do it today.  Please, PLEASE try and flush the cache state that says the authors do not want to do v6.

> 
>> By doing that, I help me, but am egregiously wasteful in the whole.
>> In turn, that impacts the total, and therefore, me.
> 
> There's nobody stopping you from getting your /10 now and then inviting
> the rest of the NAT444 operators to squat on it instead of getting their
> own.  The end result would be the same, but you won't have to risk not
> getting the necessary IETF consensus by the time IANA runs out.

And why should APNIC bear the "tax" for everyone else?


> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Tore Anderson
> Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
> Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
> 

---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops