Re: [OPSAWG] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs
Lindqvist Kurt Erik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11 nov 2010, at 09.27, Victor Kuarsingh wrote: > >>>> >>>> What advantage is there in directing *IANA* to do it? >> >> I understand why you want to use a prefix not listed in RFC 1918. I don't >> understand why getting it from IANA will be any better for you than if you get >> it from Joe's House Of IPv4 Addresses. >> > The goal here was that in aggregate, the provides use less global space for > a common use. It is more efficient for providers to share a block, then all > go to the RIRs and ask for their own slice. To make sure I understand this - then the opposite should also be true. That if a /10 is given for this, a lot of address space could be returned to the RIRs free pools? Best regards, - kurtis - _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B) - not displayed