Re: [OPSAWG] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs

Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf-Q+9Y6h9iBBLj4SYmN/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <[email protected]>
A reclaimed block, or contaminated block, would be fine for this exercise, btw.
	
	Chris

On 13Nov2010, at 08.40, Leo Vegoda wrote:

> On 12 Nov 2010, at 11:52, David Conrad wrote:
> 
>> Since IANA can't allocate anything but /8s, it is likely forever locked up... 
> 
> 
> It is worth noting that this applies to the /9 and /10 left from any /10 assigned for NAT444 as well as whatever space people might be able to reclaim from a block like 44/8. That is, even if NAT444 only needs a /10, that would leave the remainder of the /8 unavailable for allocation under the current set of policies. And while people are actively working on proposals for alternate policies, that process in unlikely to be completed in the next few months.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Leo Vegoda

---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
PGP.sig (application/pgp-signature, 455 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.