Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs

Richard Hartmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:46, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
<ietf-Q+9Y6h9iBBLj4SYmN/[email protected]> wrote:

> There is no wise choice here, it's just the least stupid one.

You seem to have decided that getting a /10 from IANA is that least
stupid option. I am not sure that will happen before IPv4 is depleted
anyway, but that's your choice to make.

If I were you, I would start contacting people about 44.200.0.0/13 or
similar spaces.

Arguing back and forth about the relative merits of NAT444 is
pointless and I think all arguments have been exchanged. People who
think NAT444 is a good idea will not change their opinion any more.
Neither will the people who think it's a bad idea.


Richard
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.