EOM (was: Re: [OPSAWG] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs)

Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf-Q+9Y6h9iBBLj4SYmN/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ops
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ok folks,

	It is obvious that the operations area can not reach consensus on an operator driven request.  Continued dDOS on this list, and on the respondents time, so I suggest we put this conversation to bed.  If we can assemble the data in time (based on the agreement from Friday afternoon), we will bring it back up.  Else, the authors, and others, will (I assume) pursue one or more other courses of action.

	I would like to thank those that had reasoned arguments, and responded civilly, and actually listened to the operational issues being raised - even if we didn't agree, those were reasonable discussions, and appreciated.  Most, if not all, of those inputs will be incorporated into whatever is done next.

	To those of you who sniped, made assumptions about underlying motivations, and the authors' desire (or not) to get this v6 pig in the air in a v4 exhausted world, etc. your comments were at least entertaining (mostly).  How much they actually contributed to the body of the conversation, other than to raise the temperature, I'm not sure, nor do I really care.

	I would leave this conversation with one final observation.  The operators are at fault here, but guess what, so are the rest of us.  We spent WAY too much time discussing the PERFECT transition mechanism, rather than a suite of WORKABLE transition mechanisms to deal with runout (which is different than a clean dual-stack world).  I believe we now have them, but they are new, and will get to the market (in the form of code, CPE, etc) too late to make this a clean transition.  There will be consequences, and it will be ugly until we can get to a clean transition state.   

	Operators didn't push for transition CPE because of tactical requirements, vendors didn't develop or ship for the same reason, and the CE vendors don't see anything to plug into.  We will now all live with the consequences for a while.  It's just going to be a choice as to which consequences you choose (or are chosen for you).

	I am neither speaking for the other authors here, nor my current, nor previous employers
	
	Chris


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM4zCtAAoJEGmx2Mt/+Iw//+wH/2TJFHHfqsT+NJozJFHLN/hX
TnRiUpXPbLRDnSf3q0ZiDRlPEXCcH0xrMLnkrDeeS3OHoqkjUK4xrM8GydQHL7WR
CwMag2XqvmW7JQkaQDoY3Ec2S0+8CWId88EDRM8e6iq/F2xqPdI5u4mFB6ZgVThJ
FD8ms4VHcD21L422zCvDcQO2RcZX4iuv3ZUxd8+1n6iMCRGOF1NolwL3c03YIj4c
Oo7NLxKP81FLmJ/E6X9d4azQuKklrqzeMqNXdLmpgrYZP95VkIT1AziBLxxARh8S
0JHYruNp1tIlWCsngEpHQCB58iVyt2Pqjn8VkkzQVGpqt9vMFdMyASYpwDIzklE=
=FvPu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.