Re: RE: AD request / L2 Triggers Chapter Statement

James Carlson <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:39:16 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pilc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Phil Neumiller writes:
> [Vern Schryver wrote]
> > I suppose instead you want your L2 triggers to reach through IP to
> > TCP to suggest that TCP do or stop doing or otherwise change.  Don't
> > you know that people have been doing such things for decades without
> > the let, leave, or hindrance of the IETF?
> 
> Yes, precisely WHY it needs to be STANDARDIZED!!! You are making
> my point for me.  Thanks!

Sure, I can see why having interface standards would be nice, but
then, why the IETF at all?  Internal implementation details really
don't seem to me to be the domain of folks engineering protocols for
the Internet itself.

This seems more appropriate for The Open Group or some other such OS
interfaces standardization body.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking         <[email protected]>
SUN Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.234W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.497N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

_______________________________________________
pilc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pilc
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pilc-charter.html
http://pilc.grc.nasa.gov/