Re: RE: AD request / L2 Triggers Chapter Statement
James Carlson <[email protected]> Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:11:54 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pilc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lloyd Wood writes: > > A link on a host going down isn't enough; the host might be multihomed, > > The host should know whether it's multihomed or not; it should know > what it's immediately connected to. If it's not multihomed and e.g. > the AAA server at the other end of the PPPoE line goes down and takes > your phoneline's TCP dialtone with it - the immediate link is down and > your stack is offline. You can inform the apps. How does the stack determine that the link is down because, for instance, the peer router is rebooting, and that it will be back in a few seconds? Should my ssh session and all of my redirected X11 windows be blown out of existence because the router at the other end of that DSL link bounces? I still don't see how link unavailablity is *reasonably* translated into TCP connection sniping -- particularly as a default policy. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> SUN Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.234W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.497N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ pilc mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pilc http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pilc-charter.html http://pilc.grc.nasa.gov/