A question of small MTUs
Matt Mathis <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:09:44 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pilc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kevin Lehey, John Heffner and I are working on a replacement for RFC1191 style path MTU discovery (See RFC2923 for some of the reasons...). In our current design there is an open question about what is the smallest MTU that is cost effective to discover dynamically. Exclude situations where the skinny link is adjacent to one TCP endpoint (e.g. cell phones) because the stack can have direct knowledge of the link. Asked another way, what is the smallest MTU that is (more than occasionally) used as an intermediate link between general purpose systems? (I also know about IP-over-foo-over-bar-over-baz-over-Ethernet) If you are interested in the details, check out http://www.psc.edu/~mathis/MTU Thanks, --MM-- ---------------------------------------------- Matt Mathis <[email protected]> W:412.268.3319 http://www.psc.edu/~mathis H:412.654.7529 ---------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ pilc mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pilc http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pilc-charter.html http://pilc.grc.nasa.gov/