A question of small MTUs

Matt Mathis <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:09:44 -0500 (EST)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pilc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Kevin Lehey, John Heffner and I are working on a replacement for RFC1191 style
path MTU discovery (See RFC2923 for some of the reasons...).

In our current design there is an open question about what is the smallest MTU 
that is cost effective to discover dynamically.   Exclude situations where 
the skinny link is adjacent to one TCP endpoint (e.g. cell phones) because the 
stack can have direct knowledge of the link.

Asked another way, what is the smallest MTU that is (more than occasionally)
used as an intermediate link between general purpose systems?

(I also know about IP-over-foo-over-bar-over-baz-over-Ethernet)

If you are interested in the details, check out http://www.psc.edu/~mathis/MTU 

Thanks,
--MM--
----------------------------------------------
Matt Mathis <[email protected]>    W:412.268.3319
http://www.psc.edu/~mathis      H:412.654.7529
----------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
pilc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pilc
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pilc-charter.html
http://pilc.grc.nasa.gov/