[pim] Re: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-15 ietf last call Op sdir review

Rishabh Parekh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pim
Message-ID <CABjMoXYb-PJZsgTasnLpUNOWjaQ23A1J1uMx7PoM2cdVU+3mnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Bing,
The controller section is meant to outline the  requirements and guidelines
for a controller to support SR P2MP policy, but not a formal specification
of the controller function. However, it does specify some behaviors with
MUST and SHOULD clauses.

I will fix the wording issues you pointed out in the next revision.

Thanks,
Rishabh.

On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 8:57 AM Bing Liu via Datatracker <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Document: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy
> Title: Segment Routing Point-to-Multipoint Policy
> Reviewer: Bing Liu
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> Hi Dear authors, I'm assigned to review
> draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy by OPSDir.
>
> General status: Ready with Nits
> I read the latest 15 version, and I believe it is ready with a couple of
> nits
> as the following.
>
> -       Section 4.2. Controller Functions
>
> I find this section is a bit ambiguous in general. It reads like to specify
> some minimal requirements for the controllers, but there are no “MUST” key
> words. If it is some considerations, then it seems a bit unnecessary since
> these are quite apparent requirements.
>
> I think the real essential thing is the “SR P2MP tree” capability
> awareness,
> both for the nodes and the controllers. If this document wants to address
> this
> issue, I think there needs to be a bit more comprehensive description. If
> not,
> simply make it an assumption/requirement is also ok.
>
> Small wording issues:
>
> - Some sections uses “forwarding plane”, while some uses “dataplane”. Maybe
> it’s better to use only one. Btw, is “dataplane” a conventional word? I
> guess
> “data plane” might be more formal usage (published RFCs seem to use it).
>
> - Section 4.3: there are two “period” at the end of the first paragraph.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.