[pim] Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-poli cy-ping-17: (with COMMENT)

Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Understandably, this document is fairly deep in the SR/MPLS stack and assumes a
familiarity with many basic terms from that technology. Thank you for
referencing sources for much of your terminology in Section 1.1. It would be
helpful to spell out some of these initialisms (CP, TI, etc.), particularly as
they are used in their expanded form later in the document. I also do not see
the term LSP referenced here; perhaps a reference to RFC 3031 Sections 2.2 and
2.3 should be added to this section, possibly with a list of terms which are
defined there and used in this document?



_______________________________________________
pim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]