[pim] Erik Kline's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast- addr-alloc-ps-07: (with DISCUSS)

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps-07: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps-07
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

## Discuss

### S4

* Please provide an example of how multicast addresses with T=1 overlap
  with ff02::1:ffxx:xxxx addresses.

### _general_

* I struggle to understand the purpose of this document.

* The document claims to "[describe] the key limitations of current
  solutions such as MADCAP", but I seem to have missed the section where
  MADCAP discussion took place.





_______________________________________________
pim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]