[pim] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mca st-addr-alloc-ps-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Nov 2025 05:01:01 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <176355726114.1233887.12020007719818759413@dt-datatracker-5bd94c585b-wk4l4> |
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps-08: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For the PIM WG chairs and responsible AD: this document appears to describe both current deployment issues (Section 2) and requirement/considerations (Section 3, and 5). However, these topics do not appear to be in scope of 08-02 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-pim/08-02/) (or 09, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-pim/09/) of the charter. The closest related text is “Create multicast protocol design experience documents”. Perhaps deployment issues could be considered “protocol design experience”, but requirements don’t seem to be fit. I’ll note that this document was adopted in Sept-2023 when the -08 charter (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-pim/08/) from 2015 scoped the WG. It also didn’t have producing informational requirements/problem statement documents in scope. Thank you for your attention to detail on milestones. I also observe there are no milestones covering this document which would indicate an approved scope when the WG was rechartered. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Joel Halpern for the GENART review, and the revisions to the document by the WG are appreciated. _______________________________________________ pim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]