[pim] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-m cast-addr-alloc-ps-10: (with COMMENT)

Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-zeroconf-mcast-addr-alloc-ps/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for address my discuss!

Note:  I'm leaving the comments below for historical reasons.

Thanks to Joe Salowey for their secdir review.  Like Paul Wouters and Joe have
stated, it appears that the security considerations doesn't really address this
potential issues.

Why not MUST?:  There are a number of SHOULDs where the rationale for why one
might not take that action is missing.



_______________________________________________
pim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]