[pim] Re: pim WGLC for draft-ietf-pim-gaap-06

Thanks Dino. Changes look good, just one thing.


On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 2:12 PM Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> We have clarified that the Timestamp is a 32-bit standard epoch UTC timestamp in seconds per RFC 8536. We also added documentation that records may not be aligned and the Group Name field follows immediately after the Timestamp field.

You misunderstood what I wrote here. I think it is good to point out
that a record starts right after the Group Name field of the previous
record.

For the address space section and reviews, should we maybe see if
mboned has thoughts on the address space? Should we try to get some
directorate reviews before requesting publication? Maybe routing area
and int area makes sense?

Can you authors (and anyone else who might know) state whether you are
aware of any IPR?

Thanks,
Stig

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]