[pim] Re: Suggestion: Re: Re: pim WGLC for draft-ietf- pim-gaap-06

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 06:38:44PM -0800, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> > So i am very happy with GAAP as a protocol. Justs not that history paragraph
> > because now with the -10 rev it's even more just a mind map.
> 
> It’s not meant to be a history lesson, just a list of other designs in this design scope. 

MADCAP and MASC are not design scope, RFC3307 only has an unfinished design scope
draft reference amonst 99.99% of non-dsign scope text, and the explanation part
of the paragraph is self contradictory.

Toerless

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]