[pim] Gorry Fairhurst's No Objection on draft-ietf-pim-updt- ipv6-dyn-mcast-addr-grp-id-12: (with COMMENT)

Gorry Fairhurst has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pim-updt-ipv6-dyn-mcast-addr-grp-id-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-updt-ipv6-dyn-mcast-addr-grp-id/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I note the Shepherd writeup says "Majority of the working group is silent, but
believe most of the WG silently support it. No one is against." - This seems a
very weak position for a PS, and perhaps reflects a lack of review - see Eric's
comment on INTAREA.

Abstract
The wording used in the abstract seems to speculate about possible
recommendations, and would be better written with terms that "define" and
"specify": /It recommends replacing these allocations with a new registry/ -
could this be: /recommends/replaces/? /The document also suggests initial
contents of the new registry:/ - could this be: /suggests/defines/?

The GENART review notes several concerns around the details of the requested
allocations. Please check carefully and ammend these.



_______________________________________________
pim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]