Re: What to do with: draft-ietf-policy-qos-device-info-model-08.txt

I have no problem to make it Informational or Experimental.
Marcus

--On Mittwoch, 9. April 2003 19:03 +0200 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I have posted my AD review to the policy WG mailing list today.
>
> Last week Friday I posted my review of QPIM.
>
> I wonder... for both documents, but specifically for this one:
>
>    Do we really want this (still) to be standards track.
>
> My reasoning:
>
> - We (or at least I) have seen interest in this space dimish
>   (if not dissappear completely)
>
> - The document has a lot of places where it talks about more
>   work that could be done, should be done, and how together
>   with that work, this would be something good. Specifically
>   a mapping to LDAP Schema . But as far as I know, we see not
>   interest in that. Do we?
>   And then, if no such docs will ever show up, what use do these
>   docs then have?
>
> - I believe I saw some ( a little) interest expressed to do an
>   LDAP Schema mapping. But not for QPIM and QDDIM, do I ?
>
> So maybe Informational or Experiemntal is better?
>
> Just thinking aloud here.
> Pls send me your comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Bert
> _______________________________________________
> Policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy



--------------------------------------
Dr. Marcus Brunner
Network Laboratories
NEC Europe Ltd.

E-Mail: [email protected]
WWW:    http://www.ccrle.nec.de/
Phone: +49 (0) 6221 905 11 29
personal home page: http://www.brubers.org/marcus