RE: [Fwd: Re: Approved: draft-ietf-policy-core-schema-16 .txt]

> As I stated a week (or two) ago, I am working this in the IESG.

> Kurt, your document has NOT yet been approved. WE're working on it.
> If you go to the ballow page (which you can do from the view details)
> then you will see that there is one D (Defer), namely Ned Freed.
> He asked for extra time to review... and he will do so before
> May 1st. At that time (I hope) the doc can pass, unless NED finds
> something serious.

There seems to be some confusion here.

First, the document I have a defer on is draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema,
not draft-ietf-policy-core-schema. The latter is in the RFC Editor
queue.

Second, I thought I made it clear on the call that there was little chance my
defer would turn into anything other than a discuss.

The problem I have with this document is that it reuses a number of attributes
from a variety of other specifications that are themselves not well specified.
And these specification issues are causing operational problems. I don't think
it is appropriate to let the specification proceed without addressing these
issues. I'm trying to find and fix as many of these as I can and I'm trying to
tap additional experienced people within Sun to review this as well.

				Ned