RE: PCLS when? [was: Re: Approved: draft-ietf-policy-co re-schema-16.txt]
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:27:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15501BC2230@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
> Joel, all, > > It has now been nearly seven months since we were advised that > the PCLS (Policy Core LDAP Schema) was approved by the IESG. Why > can't the RFC be published? > Larry, we have explained MULTIPLE times now why it cannot be published. And if the situation does not change, then the explanation will remain the same, and we can NOT publish. > How long must PCLS wait for the draft > (draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema) > upon which it unnecessarily depends? You seem to be the only one who believes that it is not a normative reference. The IESG approved the PCLS with the normative reference present, and so the doc MUST wait till that normative reference shows up as an RFC. > According to the IETF's Internet Draft Status Tracker facility, > the status of draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema has not changed since > April 17. Is it reasonable for PCLS to wait upon an activity which > is apparently not making progress? > I can tell you that that doc has been discussed a few times in the IESG lately and that the responsible AD (Ted Hardie) is trying to work out a resolution. Ted... any more you want to add? Bert AD-hat on.