RE: PCLS when? [was: Re: Approved: draft-ietf-policy-co re-schema-16.txt]

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:27:40 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.policy
Message-ID <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15501BC2230@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
> Joel, all,
> 
> It has now been nearly seven months since we were advised that
> the PCLS (Policy Core LDAP Schema) was approved by the IESG. Why
> can't the RFC be published?
> 
Larry, we have explained MULTIPLE times now why it cannot be published.
And if the situation does not change, then the explanation will
remain the same, and we can NOT publish.

> How long must PCLS wait for the draft 
> (draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema)
> upon which it unnecessarily depends? 

You seem to be the only one who believes that it is not a normative
reference. The IESG approved the PCLS with the normative reference 
present, and so the doc MUST wait till that normative reference
shows up as an RFC.


> According to the IETF's Internet Draft Status Tracker facility,
> the status of draft-zeilenga-ldap-user-schema has not changed since
> April 17. Is it reasonable for PCLS to wait upon an activity which
> is apparently not making progress?
>
I can tell you that that doc has been discussed a few times in the IESG
lately and that the  responsible AD (Ted Hardie) is trying to work out
a resolution. Ted... any more you want to add?
 
Bert
AD-hat on.