RE: QPIM
"Ron Cohen" <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:06:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Randy, I would prefer we leave OO as is. I truly think that the model is oo, but my main argument is that we need consistency with the documents QPIM is based on. The "Policy Core Information Model" - RFC 3060 abstract reads: "This document presents the object-oriented information model for representing policy information developed jointly in the IETF Policy Framework WG and as extensions to the Common Information Model (CIM) activity in the Distributed Management Task Force (DMTF)." It would be wrong for QPIM, that heavily relies on PCIM to say otherwise. Thanks Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Bush [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 8:10 PM > To: Yoram Snir (ysnir) > Cc: Joel M. Halpern; [email protected]; Ron Cohen; Yoram > Ramberg (yramberg); [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Policy] QPIM > > > > Assuming we drop the "object oriented", any other issues / comments > > before we submit a final version. > > nope >