Re: RE: PCLS classes deprecated in PCELS

Given the discussion about the relationship between PCLS and the proposed 
PCELS, allow me to ask a naive question please.

There were some significant structural changes introduced between PCIM and 
PCIMe.  They were introduced to address problems with the PCIM structuring 
when other folks tried to use that as a basis for work.
Folks seem (as I read the exchanges) to be objecting to the corresponding 
changes in the LDAP schema.
Are the folks who implemented PCLS and are concerned about the changes 
expecting to support PCIMe?
If you are expecting to support PCIMe, how would you expect to deal with 
the fact that there are structural changes in the underlying model?

Yours,
Joel M. Halpern                 speaking as an interested participant

At 09:30 AM 9/12/2003 -0500, Larry S. Bartz wrote:
>Pana, Mircea wrote, On 09/05/03 08:19:
>[snip]
>>Does anybody have running code based on PCIM, PCLS, PCIMe?
>[snip]
>>
>
>Yes. We have running code which is dependent upon PCIM and PCLS. The
>code implements applications which are in production. They are used
>every day to support real work.
>
>
>--
>--
>#::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|
># Larry Bartz
>#
>#  voice (317) 226-7060
>#  FAX   (317) 226-6378
>#::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Policy mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy