Re: pcimRepository and pcelsReusableContainer
Ryan Moats <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:39:16 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.policy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Lemur Networks, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 15 February 2004 08:04 pm, [email protected] wrote: > The open issue #4 listed in Appendix B) in PCELS-04 refers to the proposed > implementation for the ReusablePolicyContainer class. The authors have > reached an impasse and would appreciate input from the WG wrt. the options > presented below. I'll admit to not being an implementer of PCELS (either currently or planned). Having said that, if I were going to implement PCELS on top of my PCLS implementation, I don't really see the difference between the two approaches. The same entry could be designated both pcimRepository and pcelsReusableContainer independent of the two options. Color me confused because this really looks like a nit. Ryan