RE: pcimRepository and pcelsReusableContainer
[email protected] Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:10:43 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3F43A.7690099C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Ryan, When it is desired for a PCELS implementation to create reusable policy definitions that can be shared with PCLS implementations, the pcelsReusableContainer instances it creates must also be pcimRepository instances. This is achieved through inheritance (option 1) or through an explicit action (option 2). Mircea. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Moats [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 9:39 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Policy] pcimRepository and pcelsReusableContainer > > > On Sunday 15 February 2004 08:04 pm, [email protected] wrote: > > The open issue #4 listed in Appendix B) in PCELS-04 refers > to the proposed > > implementation for the ReusablePolicyContainer class. The > authors have > > reached an impasse and would appreciate input from the WG > wrt. the options > > presented below. > > I'll admit to not being an implementer of PCELS (either > currently or planned). > Having said that, if I were going to implement PCELS on top > of my PCLS > implementation, I don't really see the difference between the > two approaches. > The same entry could be designated both pcimRepository and > pcelsReusableContainer independent of the two options. > > Color me confused because this really looks like a nit. > > Ryan > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3F43A.7690099C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.5.2657.73"> <TITLE>RE: [Policy] pcimRepository and pcelsReusableContainer</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Ryan,</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>When it is desired for a PCELS implementation to = create reusable policy definitions that can be shared with PCLS = implementations, the pcelsReusableContainer instances it creates must = also be pcimRepository instances. This is achieved through inheritance = (option 1) or through an explicit action (option 2).</FONT></P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Mircea.</FONT> </P> <BR> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> -----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> From: Ryan Moats [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]= </A>]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 9:39 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Subject: Re: [Policy] pcimRepository and = pcelsReusableContainer</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> On Sunday 15 February 2004 08:04 pm, = [email protected] wrote:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > The open issue #4 listed in Appendix B) in = PCELS-04 refers </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> to the proposed</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > implementation for the = ReusablePolicyContainer class. The </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> authors have</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > reached an impasse and would appreciate = input from the WG </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> wrt. the options</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > presented below.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> I'll admit to not being an implementer of PCELS = (either </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> currently or planned). </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Having said that, if I were going to implement = PCELS on top </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> of my PCLS </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> implementation, I don't really see the = difference between the </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> two approaches. </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> The same entry could be designated both = pcimRepository and </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> pcelsReusableContainer independent of the two = options.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Color me confused because this really looks = like a nit.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Ryan</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3F43A.7690099C--