Re: Policy LDAP Schema

Bert and all,

http://www.ops.ietf.org/draft-status.html  indicates Kurt Zeilenga is in
possession of the draft on behalf of the IESG. A month ago, I asked Kurt
about the status of the draft. Here is what he said:

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote, On 06/07/2002 12:10 PM:
 > As far as I know, the AD is awaiting for submission of a
 > revised I-D to address a number of issues.  These include
 > clarifications associated with the I-D's normative reference
 > to DSP0123, an "external specification" and the addition of
 > an "IANA Considerations" section.

My query http://atm.tut.fi/list-archive/policy/msg00697.html and Kurt's
reply http://atm.tut.fi/list-archive/policy/msg00698.html both posted
to this list.

When Kurt's reply did not elicit a reponse from the draft's authors,
I posted this followup: http://atm.tut.fi/list-archive/policy/msg00701.html
which also failed to elicit a response from the draft's authors.

On Monday of this week, I had a private conversation with one of
the draft's authors. He indicated surprise that the  "external 
specification"
issue was still a hangup. The draft's normative reference to the DMTF's
DSP0123 had been thoroughly discussed in this forum last November.

What is going on here? Is the delay in advancing PCLS due to a
miscommunication, or is there really an unresolved issue?

-- 
--
#::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|
# Larry Bartz                           |                              |
#  [email protected]     | Ooo, ooo,                    |
#                                       | Ooo, ooo, oooooo!            |
#                                       | I've got a gnu attitude!     |
#  voice (317) 226-7060                 |                              |
#  FAX   (317) 226-6378                 |                              |
#::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|


 

Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote, On 07/10/2002 12:31 AM:

>This document is in the IESG queue and being processes.
>
>The IANA normally makes the final assignments just before the
>documents get published as RFC. So it may take another couple
>of months before that happens.
>
>Bert 
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: David McTavish [mailto:[email protected]]
>>Sent: dinsdag 9 juli 2002 23:16
>>To: '[email protected]'
>>Subject: [Policy] Policy LDAP Schema
>>
>>
>>
>>I was wondering if there was any progress in obtaining OID's 
>>and definitions
>>for the LDAP implementation of the Policy schema.
>>(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-policy-core-sc
>>hema-14.txt).
>>My company is basing our schema on the PCIM model and would like to
>>implement soon.  Any idea on when OID's will be obtained, or 
>>what they are
>>would be greatly appreciated.  In the interim, I have been 
>>using my own
>>company OID to have a usable schema. Please feel free to replace the
>>Sandvine PCIM OID's (1.3.6.1.4.1.11610.2) with the proper 
>>IANA-sponsored
>>PCIM OID.
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>David McTavish
>>
>>
>>
>> <<pcim.schema>> 
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Policy mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy
>  
>