RE: ping Re: New PCLS Draft

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:02:07 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.policy
Message-ID <A451D5E6F15FD211BABC0008C7FAD7BC0F0DB195@nl0006exch003u.nl.lucent.com>
Was up till now not yet at the top of my queue

Sorry and thanks for the reminder
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry S. Bartz [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: donderdag 3 oktober 2002 15:46
> To: Wijnen, Bert
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: ping Re: [Policy] New PCLS Draft
> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
> I've checked recently posted IESG status reports and can't 
> find evidence
> that the PCLS draft has made any progress. Has it? When will it?
> 
> TIA,
> Larry
> 
> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote, On 09/19/2002 07:41 AM:
> 
> >Bert has it in his list-of-things-todo
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Bert 
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Larry S. Bartz [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>Sent: donderdag 19 september 2002 14:29
> >>To: Ed Ellesson
> >>Cc: [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: [Policy] New PCLS Draft
> >>
> >>
> >>Ed Ellesson wrote, On 09/02/2002 01:34 PM:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Please note that the following draft, "Policy Core LDAP 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Schema" is now
> >>    
> >>
> >>>available in the IETF Internet Draft Repository:
> >>>
> >>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-policy-core-sc
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>hema-15.txt
> >>    
> >>
> >>>I have also sent a note to our Area Director, Bert Wijnen, 
> requesting
> >>>that he forward this draft to the IESG for consideration as 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>a proposed
> >>    
> >>
> >>>standard, since the authors have incorporated the changes 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>requested as a
> >>    
> >>
> >>>result of the IESG review of the previous draft (-14).
> >>>
> >>>The changes were mainly to do with format and how documents were
> >>>referenced , plus there were a few fixes associated with technical
> >>>errors/omissions.  None of these justify another working group last
> >>>call.  
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Ed,
> >>
> >>Thanks for keeping us apprised of the recent progress of 
> >>PCLS. Your messages
> >>of 7/16, 8/12, 8/16, 8/30, and 9/02 indicated vigorous activity and 
> >>suggested
> >>that PCLS may be approaching its goal. 
> >>  
> >>What's the latest? Did Bert agee to forward the draft to 
> the IESG for 
> >>consideration
> >>as a proposed standard? Can you estimate a date of RFC publication?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Policy mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> 
> 
>