RE: ping Re: New PCLS Draft
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:02:07 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A451D5E6F15FD211BABC0008C7FAD7BC0F0DB195@nl0006exch003u.nl.lucent.com> |
Was up till now not yet at the top of my queue Sorry and thanks for the reminder Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry S. Bartz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: donderdag 3 oktober 2002 15:46 > To: Wijnen, Bert > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: ping Re: [Policy] New PCLS Draft > > > Bert, > > I've checked recently posted IESG status reports and can't > find evidence > that the PCLS draft has made any progress. Has it? When will it? > > TIA, > Larry > > Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote, On 09/19/2002 07:41 AM: > > >Bert has it in his list-of-things-todo > > > >Thanks, > >Bert > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Larry S. Bartz [mailto:[email protected]] > >>Sent: donderdag 19 september 2002 14:29 > >>To: Ed Ellesson > >>Cc: [email protected] > >>Subject: Re: [Policy] New PCLS Draft > >> > >> > >>Ed Ellesson wrote, On 09/02/2002 01:34 PM: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Please note that the following draft, "Policy Core LDAP > >>> > >>> > >>Schema" is now > >> > >> > >>>available in the IETF Internet Draft Repository: > >>> > >>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-policy-core-sc > >>> > >>> > >>hema-15.txt > >> > >> > >>>I have also sent a note to our Area Director, Bert Wijnen, > requesting > >>>that he forward this draft to the IESG for consideration as > >>> > >>> > >>a proposed > >> > >> > >>>standard, since the authors have incorporated the changes > >>> > >>> > >>requested as a > >> > >> > >>>result of the IESG review of the previous draft (-14). > >>> > >>>The changes were mainly to do with format and how documents were > >>>referenced , plus there were a few fixes associated with technical > >>>errors/omissions. None of these justify another working group last > >>>call. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>Ed, > >> > >>Thanks for keeping us apprised of the recent progress of > >>PCLS. Your messages > >>of 7/16, 8/12, 8/16, 8/30, and 9/02 indicated vigorous activity and > >>suggested > >>that PCLS may be approaching its goal. > >> > >>What's the latest? Did Bert agee to forward the draft to > the IESG for > >>consideration > >>as a proposed standard? Can you estimate a date of RFC publication? > >> > >> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Policy mailing list > >>[email protected] > >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy > >> > >> > >> > > >