Re: [Off Topic] Need review for POP3 extension mechanism

Thanks for your comments, Alexey.

At 3:27 PM -0700 7/10/98, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

>PASS command is affected by LOGIN-DELAY also.

Yes, this is a (minor) error and should be fixed.

>I think that LOGIN-DELAY response to USER command may server as a
>hint for attack on server.  I propose to forbid server answer "-ERR
>[LOGIN-DELAY n]" to the USER command.

It would be good to add text suggesting that servers not send
LOGIN-DELAY in response to a USER command, and noting why, but I'm not
sure we need to forbid it.

>Last question : why authors decided to change syntax for IMPLEMENTATION from
>IMPLEMENTATION "Shlemazle Plotz v302"
>to
>IMPLEMENTATION Shlemazle-Plotz-v302

The POP protocol doesn't have the concept of a quoted string; responses
are a series of space-delimited tokens.  The IMPLEMENTATION capability
was corrected to reflect this, and text was added to point out that if
the parameter is supposed to be a single token, to make sure there are
no embedded spaces.  (Of course, since IMPLEMENTATION is only for
logging, it doesn't really matter.)

I don't think these corrections are serious enough for a new version of
the draft and a new last call; they may be minor enough for the RFC
editor to make, as provided for, or they can be corrected later.