Soliciting Comments on draft-melnikov-pop3-over-tls-00

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <[email protected]> Sun, 15 May 2011 13:48:15 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pop3ext,gmane.ietf.tls
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030300080601070901050205
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello all,

Alexey Melnikov an I have undertaken an attempt to document the POP3 
over TLS binding (aka POP3S).  The corresponding I-D is 
draft-melnikov-pop3-over-tls-00 can be found here:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-melnikov-pop3-over-tls-00

The draft replaces old draft-yevstifeyev-pops-uri-scheme 
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-pops-uri-scheme-03) you 
should be aware of.  The new document contains more detailed description 
of different issues concerning POP3S; however the main issue is 
TRANSACTION vs. AUTHORIZATION state after TLS handshake and the way of 
signaling it.

I'd like to ask you to provide your comments on this draft, not limited 
to aforementioned issue only.  Please, while responding, keep all 
recipient addresses in the message.

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

P.S.  The most appropriate list for discussing this draft is certainly 
ietf-pop3ext, but I think it will be useful to direct the message to tls 
list in order to allow TLS experts review and comment it.  Mykyta

--------------030300080601070901050205
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by hoffman.proper.com id p4FAla65071505

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF=
-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor=3D"#ffffff" text=3D"#000000">
    <font size=3D"-1"><big>Hello all,<br>
        <br>
        Alexey Melnikov an I have undertaken an attempt to document the
        POP3 over TLS binding (aka POP3S).=C2=A0 The corresponding I-D is
        draft-melnikov-pop3-over-tls-00 can be found here:<br>
        <br>
        <a class=3D"moz-txt-link-freetext" href=3D"http://tools.ietf.org/=
html/draft-melnikov-pop3-over-tls-00">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-me=
lnikov-pop3-over-tls-00</a><br>
        <br>
        The draft replaces old draft-yevstifeyev-pops-uri-scheme
        (<a class=3D"moz-txt-link-freetext" href=3D"http://tools.ietf.org=
/html/draft-yevstifeyev-pops-uri-scheme-03">http://tools.ietf.org/html/dr=
aft-yevstifeyev-pops-uri-scheme-03</a>)
        you should be aware of.=C2=A0 The new document contains more deta=
iled
        description of different issues concerning POP3S; however the
        main issue is TRANSACTION vs. AUTHORIZATION state after TLS
        handshake and the way of signaling it.<br>
        <br>
        I'd like to ask you to provide your comments on this draft, not
        limited to aforementioned issue only.=C2=A0 Please, while respond=
ing,
        keep all recipient addresses in the message.<br>
        <br>
        Mykyta Yevstifeyev<br>
        <br>
        P.S.=C2=A0 The most appropriate list for discussing this draft is
        certainly ietf-pop3ext, but I think it will be useful to direct
        the message to tls list in order to allow TLS experts review and
        comment it.=C2=A0 Mykyta<br>
      </big></font>
  </body>
</html>

--------------030300080601070901050205--