Re: POP3 "resume download" extension
"R.Srinivasan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pop3ext |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ramp Network (p) Ltd |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Anders Rundegren wrote: > I've had some thoughts about an extension to POP3 that will let you > resume a download of an interrupted transfer. These days people tend to > send each other messages with large attachment, 2-3Mb is not that > uncommon. Many clients connecting to their ISP, or even the ISP itself, > have their modems improperly setup which causes a flaky phoneline, > resulting in a premature disconnect. > > At present, these messages will have to be re-downloaded from scratch > taking a lot of unnecessary bandwidth from the ISP, not to mention > resources within the system itself. Since a majority of the ISPs today > are still using POP3, as opposed to IMAP (mostly due to the reduced > diskspace required when serving a huge numbers of users), I think this > might be a good idea. > > I've spent the last week discussing and developing the idea with a few > people, and they are all backing up the idea. I now felt it was time to > take it to this group in order to get a response from a larger group. > > We all came to the conslusion that by giving the RETR command a second > argument specifying the offset of where to start downloading would > probably be the best idea. Also, there was a discussion on wheather an > octet range, (a third argument, specifying where the end of the download > should take place) would be appropriate now that we see a lot more > portable internet devices where bandwidth is scarce. > > A breakdown on savings: > > 1) Less consumption of bandwidth > 2) Less resources used on the servers > 3) ISPs wishing to have this feature will not be forced to deploy an > IMAP server > > Not to mention happier users getting their files faster and cheaper (in > Sweden, and most other countries in Europe, flatrates are just a mere > dream). > > // Anders Rundegren Yes, i guess this would be a good idea to have this option in POP3. I agree with Anders that it would not be like IMAP4. Probably i guess we should go ahead and propose this feature. Srinivasan