Re: POP3 "resume download" extension

"R.Srinivasan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pop3ext
Organization Ramp Network (p) Ltd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Anders Rundegren wrote:

> I've had some thoughts about an extension to POP3 that will let you
> resume a download of an interrupted transfer. These days people tend to
> send each other messages with large attachment, 2-3Mb is not that
> uncommon. Many clients connecting to their ISP, or even the ISP itself,
> have their modems improperly setup which causes a flaky phoneline,
> resulting in a premature disconnect.
>
> At present, these messages will have to be re-downloaded from scratch
> taking a lot of unnecessary bandwidth from the ISP, not to mention
> resources within the system itself. Since a majority of the ISPs today
> are still using POP3, as opposed to IMAP (mostly due to the reduced
> diskspace required when serving a huge numbers of users), I think this
> might be a good idea.
>
> I've spent the last week discussing and developing the idea with a few
> people, and they are all backing up the idea. I now felt it was time to
> take it to this group in order to get a response from a larger group.
>
> We all came to the conslusion that by giving the RETR command a second
> argument specifying the offset of where to start downloading would
> probably be the best idea. Also, there was a discussion on wheather an
> octet range, (a third argument, specifying where the end of the download
> should take place) would be appropriate now that we see a lot more
> portable internet devices where bandwidth is scarce.
>
> A breakdown on savings:
>
> 1) Less consumption of bandwidth
> 2) Less resources used on the servers
> 3) ISPs wishing to have this feature will not be forced to deploy an
> IMAP server
>
> Not to mention happier users getting their files faster and cheaper (in
> Sweden, and most other countries in Europe, flatrates are just a mere
> dream).
>
> // Anders Rundegren

Yes, i guess this would be a good idea to have this option in POP3. I agree
with
Anders that it would not be like IMAP4. Probably i guess we should go ahead
and propose this feature.

Srinivasan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.