Re: new draft published: draft-vautrin-pppext-ipv6-mlppp-id-00.txt

Hello, I published this draft with the new name to show that it needs to be under the pppext WG.

This is now:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-vautrin-pppext-ipv6-mlppp-id-00.txt

Thanks,
Olivier

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Carlson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 1:00 PM
> To: Olivier Vautrin
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pppext] new draft published: draft-vautrin-6man-ipv6-
> mlppp-id-00.txt
> 
> Olivier Vautrin wrote:
> > Hello James, thanks for your feedback please see below.
> >
> > Yes, I think this document should be a WG document. I thought 6man WG
> would be the right place, but I guess PPPext WG makes more sense.
> 
> OK; thanks.  Consider it done.  You'd need our group's approval anyway
> to modify the IANA registry for the new E-D Class value.
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext