Re: [rbridge] Fwd: Working group last call for PPP TRILL [was I-D Action: draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-04.txt]

Reviewed latest 04 version

Happy, no issues.

Jon

On May 13, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> TRILL participant may be interested in the below Last Call in the
> PPPEXT Working Group.
> 
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street
>  Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  [email protected]
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: James Carlson <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:14 PM
> Subject: [Pppext] Working group last call for PPP TRILL [was I-D
> Action: draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-04.txt]
> To: PPP Extensions <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> [email protected] wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions Working Group of the IETF.
>> 
>>       Title           : PPP TRILL Protocol Control Protocol
>>       Author(s)       : James Carlson
>>       Filename        : draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-04.txt
>>       Pages           : 7
>>       Date            : 2011-05-09
> 
> In this new version, I've removed stray footnote references from the
> stand-alone Abstract section and added a bit of detail to the Security
> Considerations -- specifically citing at least a few of the protocols
> involved.  There's a slippery slope here, in that I could easily end up
> describing all the possible deployment scenarios and incorporating
> essentially all of rfc-index.txt by reference, but I hope I've struck a
> reasonable balance.
> 
> I've left the system ID issue as an informative reference.  No matter
> how I read this PPP document, providing system IDs is not a requirement
> for implementing this protocol.  It _might_ be a requirement for IS-IS
> implementations.  But the protocol described here isn't IS-IS.
> 
> So, with that, I'm starting up the last call period again.  Please
> respond by May 23rd, 2011, if you have any comments.  After that date,
> I'll ask the IESG to consider publishing.
> 
> --
> James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <[email protected]>
> _______________________________________________
> Pppext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rbridge mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext