Re: Proposal to solve ML-PPP ambiguity

On 05/26/11 17:55, Vernon Schryver wrote:
>> From: James Carlson <[email protected]>
>> To: Vineet kumar Garg <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> 
>> For what it's worth, although I agree that an implementor's guide might
>> be helpful,  
> 
> What's wrong with the existing implementors' guides?  I thought at
> least this one mentioned that de facto standard tactic for handling
> MP misconfiguration:

I meant an Informational or perhaps Best Practices RFC describing MP
implementation issues.  I was trying to redirect away from
protocol-level fixes and towards documentation fixes.

Yeah, I could have suggested googling ... but I was trying to walk a
fine line about my own work.  (For what it's worth, I no longer get a
penny out of it.  :-/)

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext