Re: IETF80 questions regarding "On demand IPv4 address provisioning in Dual-Stack PPP deployment" - Topic for WG?
Dave Thaler <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:04:39 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.int,gmane.ietf.pppext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B10EE86@TK5EX14MBXW601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> |
Mark Townsley wrote: [...] > Applications may not be all that forgiving to IPv4 coming and going either, e.g., > I have a popular mail client that has recently taken to crashing when I switch > from wired to wireless and get a different IP address in the process. Some of > the IM connections I keep up recover quickly to IP changes, others do not. The > IETF has a whole WG (DNA) dedicated to this tricky behavior of an IP address > coming and going - it's not always easy, in particular when the link-layer is not > giving your IP stack any up/down notification, which I believe by definition is > what your proposal requires from the very start. [...] I'll second the above. This is very problematic for some applications. (Other solutions like DSTM that have on-demand IP addresses have this same issue.) So any network that deploys such a solution in anything other than a tightly controlled environment where directly connected nodes are restricted to a specific set of pre-tested applications, will likely result in many support calls. -Dave