Re: Future of the PPP WG
Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Oct 2011 00:29:35 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pppext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF4+nEGyMbLN2_i=5p8JPnhMGLF+a12ck13c9fdoe00w=s3f3g@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Vernon Schryver <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Glen Zorn <[email protected]> > >> Actually, there is one useful thing that this WG could do before its >> demise: update or obsolete RFC 3818 so that necessary work can be done >> when it (the WG) is gone. > > RFC 3818 does nothing but require that IANA demand IETF consensus (not > necessarily consensus in this WG) before assigning new numbers in some > address spaces. =A0... > > ... Actually, you can't make IANA Consideration criteria for assignment dependent on approval by a Working Group because IETF Working Groups are considered transient entities, notwithstanding that some WGs have been around for a long time. Thanks, Donald =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D =A0Donald E. Eastlake 3rd=A0=A0 +1-508-333-2270 (cell) =A0155 Beaver Street,=A0Milford, MA 01757 USA [email protected] _______________________________________________ Pppext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext