Re: IANA Considerations for PPP to Proposed Standard
Thomas Narten <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pppext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> The PPPEXT Working Group recommends that IANA Considerations for PPP, > draft-schryver-pppext-iana-00.txt, be advanced to Proposed Standard. (back from vacation now...) I have some nits I'll forward later, but overall the document looks fine to me, so I'll start the last call. I think BCP is the better categorization. Other IANA documents have been issued as BCPs, and it doesn't really make sense to advance this type of document along the standards track (how do we test for interoperability?). Regarding the IPR boilerplate, RFC 2026 requires all documents to have it, though we haven't been consistent about enforcing it (until more recently) except in cases where IPR was know to have been asserted. Thomas