Re: pppcn

On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 11:04 AM, James Carlson wrote:
> However, if this issue, despite all of the previous discussion
> stretching back years in the ietf-ppp archives, is going to keep
> coming back to life like an extra from a Cesar Romero movie, then I
> guess a preemptive "please try something else" document is the only
> way out.
>
> (I'd still question the usefulness of that document somewhat, since I
> don't quite see why such an Informational RFC would necessarily be any
> more likely to be seen and read than are the existing working group
> archives.  But perhaps it's worth a shot.)

Um, didn't you write a book that describes this?  Couldn't we just 
point people at your book?  (Didn't I just do that yesterday?  :-)

Karl