Re: (resend) Working group last call: PWE3 PPP assignment

James Carlson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pppext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thomas Narten writes:
> I've had some private discussion with the pwe3 chairs about this, and
> our current understanding is that no PPP code point is actually
> needed. What the PWE3 architecture document was trying to do was reuse
> the existing PPP registry so it wouldn't have create its own, since
> many/most/all of the same entries would be in both. But, it turns out
> that is probably not the right thing to do. A draft that explains what
> is really needed will be written and made available soon. At that
> point, we can revisit if needed.

Thanks, Thomas.  We'll wait to hear from the authors of that draft
before doing anything further.

-- 
James Carlson, IP Systems Group                <[email protected]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.234W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.497N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.