Re: Review of draft-bberry-pppoe-credit (Informational)

Vernon Schryver <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pppext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> From: Bo Berry <[email protected]>
> To: Vernon Schryver <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
>         [email protected], [email protected]

> We needed a means to control the eb-n-flow of packets between the
> router and the radio independent of PPP.  So each router-radio,
> radio-radio (RLP) and radio-router link provides flow
> control relative to its segment.  PPPoE fit the overall model.

How is using PPPoE for flow control independent of PPP?

Aren't there existing, standard ways to do traffic shaping that would
not require extensions to PPPoE?
What about the reliable link flavor of PPP?  Why wouldn't it provide
flow control on its segment out of the box?


Vernon Schryver    [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.